DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE MATERIAL COMMAND MANAGEMENT & EQUIPMENT
EVALUATION PROGRAM (MEEP)
On Kulish Multi-Monopolar Fuel Saving System
FROM: 615
SMSQ/LGTV - 20 Aug 93
201 Blscayne Ave.
Bldg 613 Suite 2
Eglin AFB FL. 32542
SUBJ: Report on Test Results from MEEP Project EV 92-95 Magnatizer
TO: The
Monopole Group, Inc. Attn: Edwin White PO Box 1000
Rt. 413 £ Point Pleasant Pike
Gardenville PA. 18926
1. The following information is furnished in accordance
with MEEP Project
Evaluation/Reporting Instructions as interim action on subject
project.
a. Project Title: Monopole.
b. Dates of Project: From 11 Jan 93 TO 21
Jul 93.
c. Project Description: Discussion:
(1). Background: Four vehicles at
Hurlburt Field, FL were removed from service, exhaust gas emissions were tested
for pollutants, and Mono-Pole (single pole) Magnets were installed. The vehicles
were allowed to run for an additional 10 minutes, then emissions were again
examined. Dramatic improvement in harmful emissions were noted. Vehicle
technicians at Hurlburt assisted In this evaluation. The same Hurlburt Field
mechanic performed all emission tests using the Bear 200 series diagnostic
analyzer. This unit was capable of four gas analysis. All tests were performed
with engines at operating temperature. Following the test completion period, all
Magnets were removed from the vehicles and held for disposition.
(2) .
Guidelines:
(a). Hurlburt Field personnel selected four vehicles for the
evaluation. Two vehicles were gasoline engine driven and
two were diesel engine
driven.
(b). A mechanic conducted an exhaust emissions test of all vehicles
prior to installation of the magnet system.
(c). Mr Tucker and Mr Fitsell of
Mono-Tec Group Inc installed fuel system magnets using only plastic wire bundle
ties. No fuel lines were disturbed or cut. A large cooling system magnet was
Installed on the lower radiator hose, again using only plastic ties. Another
large magnet of the opposite magnetic pole to those installed on the fuel lines
was installed on the rubber hose leading to the engine air intake.
(d). A
vehicle emissions test was conducted after installation and results recorded.
(3). Advantages: The magnets reduced harmful emissions in the gasoline engine
almost immediately after installation and continued to maintain the reduced
emissions throughout 2 the project (see emission analysis chart). The diesel
engines showed an immediate reduction of visible smoke. Prior to magnet
installation the 1335 bus was a heavy smoker putting out clouds of black smoke.
After installation, the smoke could barely be distinguished with the naked eye.
(4). Disadvantages: None noted.
(5). Safety: No safety hazards were encountered.
(6). Savings:
("a}. Tangible savings; Exhaust emissions analysis indicate
reduced hydrocarbon emissions which is indicative of .better combustion. It must
be assumed that with better combustion better fuel mileage Is realized. However,
with the current methods of Air Force fuel issue and control, fuel consumption
could not be tracked.
(b). Intangible savings: Less pollution in the atmosphere.
d. Project Results:
(1). Conclusions: The Monopole fuel treatment system
demonstrated the ability to reduce harmful emissions in both gasoline and diesel
engines. The coolant magnet was not considered a significant factor when
measuring emissions. Due to circumstances beyond our control no conclusions were
reached concerning the coolant system magnet.
(2). Recommendations: We are
recommending the Monopole fuel system magnets be approved for Air Force
adoption. Further recommend a national stock number be assigned.
e. Actions
TaJ<ren: These recommendations have been submitted to Warner Eobblns ALC/LVV for
review and approval of this product for Air Force use. Please note that final
action has not been determined on this project and recommendations are subject
to change.
2. ' This report will not be used for commercial publicity,
advertisement, or sales purposes to other than Federal or Civil government
agencies as addressed In paragraph 12 of the bailment agreement between the
United States Air Force and Manufacturer.
3. Point of contact 615 SMSQ/LGTV, CMSgt Rich Richards.
 |
|
JACOB L. DETUEILER Chief, Air Force Management & Equipment Evaluation Program |
|
|
|
|